MICCAI 2026 Workshop

BRIDGE
Workshop

Bridging Regulatory Science and Medical Imaging Evaluation — from technical performance to real-world utility and clinical value.

DateSeptember 27 · Strasbourg, France
VenueMICCAI 2026
ProceedingsSpringer LNCS
From Performance to Patient Benefit
01
Evaluate It
Rigorous technical assessment of AI model performance
02
Measure Its Value
Does it add value, or genuinely improve outcomes and clinical decisions?
03
Deploy It
Safe, effective, and responsible clinical deployment
04
Monitor It
Post-market monitoring: drift detection, ongoing performance validation, and sustained safety and effectiveness
Regulatory-driven AI innovation. Every stage of AI development should align with safety standards, and every risk, every failure — must be measured, documented, and mitigated.

Building Medical AI That Works — Safe, Effective, and Clinically Valuable

The field has focused heavily on developing state-of-the-art models, benchmarking on static datasets, and optimizing metrics that often do not reflect the clinical task. The result: AI models that perform well in research settings routinely fail to deliver meaningful benefit once deployed in clinical practice — and in some cases lead to serious consequences impacting patients and the healthcare system.

To build medical AI that works safely, effectively, and as intended — while adding real value to clinical practice — we must start with the end goal. What problem will this AI solve? What will it do for the patient? What value will it add to the clinician or health system? The end goal must be defined before the model is built.

We must also ensure that every stage of AI development has a mechanism to measure risk, that we choose the right metrics to evaluate those risks, and that every design and development decision aligns with safety and responsible AI principles.

"Design for translation. Evaluate what matters. Measure clinical value. Deploy responsibly. Monitor continuously."

While many MICCAI workshops focus on technical innovation, state-of-the-art model development, and performance improvements on benchmark datasets, BRIDGE focuses on what comes next: how AI innovations should be evaluated, translated, and implemented so they can function safely and effectively in real world clinical settings. The workshop emphasizes the evaluation aspects of medical AI innovation, including whether models perform as intended, whether they are robust across populations and clinical environments, whether they provide evidence of clinical value, and whether they can be responsibly deployed and monitored after implementation.

BRIDGE brings together AI researchers, clinicians, regulatory scientists, health economists, industry leaders, and implementation experts to discuss how innovative medical imaging and medical AI technologies can move from research prototypes to clinically useful tools.

Submit Your Research

We invite original research papers, empirical studies, position papers, and negative results on topics related to the evaluation, clinical translation, regulation, and post-market monitoring of medical AI systems.

Submit on OpenReview

Research Topics

The BRIDGE track welcomes submissions on the evaluation and clinical translation of medical AI, including technical performance assessment, clinical utility, regulatory science, and post-deployment monitoring. Topics include but are not limited to:

Stage 01

AI Evaluation and Performance Assessment

  • Evaluation frameworks and methodologies for medical AI models in MIC and CAI
  • Performance metrics for diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and decision-support AI applications, including metrics that better reflect downstream clinical actions and patient benefit
  • Evaluation of model robustness, generalizability, reliability, and failure modes across real-world operating conditions
  • Benchmark design, dataset curation, and limitations of static dataset evaluation for medical AI translation, including dataset representativeness, hidden biases, annotation quality
  • Evaluation of clinical value, including patient benefit, clinician decision support, workflow impact, care efficiency, resource utilization, etc.
  • Evaluation of large language models, multimodal foundation models, and generalist medical AI systems
  • Explainability and interpretability methods and their clinical relevance
  • Negative results and lessons learned from failed evaluations
Stage 02

Clinical Utility and Value Assessment

  • Methods for measuring clinical utility and decision impact of AI tools
  • Clinical validation study design for AI-based medical devices
  • Patient outcome metrics and how to link them to AI performance
  • Health economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness of AI systems
  • Studies reporting limited, negative, or unexpected clinical value
  • Identification of mismatches between technical metrics and clinical outcomes
  • Human factors and the effect of AI on clinician decision-making
Stage 03

Regulatory Science and Clinical Deployment

  • Regulatory frameworks for AI-based medical devices (FDA, EU MDR, and international)
  • Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) evaluation and approval pathways
  • Pre-market evaluation requirements and evidence standards for AI
  • Algorithmic bias, fairness, and equity in clinical AI deployment
  • Workflow integration and implementation challenges in clinical environments
  • Case studies of AI deployment: barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned
  • Ethics, transparency, and accountability in clinical AI systems
Stage 04

Post-Market Monitoring and Lifecycle Management

  • Post-market surveillance methods for deployed AI systems
  • Detection of performance degradation, data drift, and distribution shift
  • Frameworks for ongoing monitoring of safety and clinical effectiveness
  • Model updating, retraining, and version control under regulatory constraints
  • Continual learning systems and associated regulatory considerations
  • Incident reporting and corrective action processes for AI medical devices
  • Long-term real-world evidence generation for AI systems

Submission Deadlines

All deadlines are 23:59 Pacific Time.

1Jul 2026
Full Paper Deadline
23:59 Pacific Time
31Jul 2026
Notification of Acceptance
Authors notified by email
15Aug 2026
Camera-Ready Version
Final submission due
27Sep 2026
Workshop Day
MICCAI 2026 · Strasbourg, France

Submission Format

All submissions must follow the official Springer LNCS format and be fully anonymized for double-blind peer review.

  • Official Springer LNCS format (Word and LaTeX templates available)
  • Up to 8 pages of main content
  • Up to 2 additional pages for references only
  • Double-blind peer review — fully anonymized submissions
  • Remove author names, affiliations, and self-identifying references
  • Submit via OpenReview

Accepted papers will be published in the MICCAI 2026 Workshops proceedings in Springer's Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) series.

Submit on OpenReview

Workshop Schedule

Full program details are to be announced. The workshop will bring together participants from academia, industry, and regulatory bodies for a full day of presentations, discussions, and networking.

📅 September 27, 2026  ·  MICCAI 2026 · Strasbourg, France
📋

Program Coming Soon

The full workshop program is currently being finalized. The program will include keynote talks, oral and poster presentations, and a panel discussion featuring participants from academia, industry, and regulatory bodies.

🎤

Keynote Talks

Invited speakers from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies

📄

Paper Presentations

Oral and poster presentations of accepted research papers

💬

Panel Discussion

Cross-sector dialogue on regulatory-driven AI innovation

Organizers & Advisory Board

The BRIDGE workshop is organized by a team of researchers and scientists working at the intersection of medical AI, evaluation science, and regulatory research.

Workshop Organizers

Dr. Ghada Zamzmi
Dr. Ghada Zamzmi
HeartFlow, USA
gzamzmi@heartflow.com
Dr. Annika Reinke
Dr. Annika Reinke
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Germany
a.reinke@dkfz-heidelberg.de
Dr. Thijs Kooi
Dr. Thijs Kooi
Lunit Inc, South Korea
tkooi@lunit.io

Scientific Advisors

Senior researchers and policy experts guiding the scientific and regulatory direction of BRIDGE.

Dr. Ehsan Adeli
Dr. Ehsan Adeli
Stanford University, USA
Dr. Marzyeh Ghassemi
Dr. Marzyeh Ghassemi
MIT, USA
Dr. Lena Maier-Hein
Dr. Lena Maier-Hein
Heidelberg University, Germany
Dr. Federica Zanca
Dr. Federica Zanca
EISMEA – European Commission, Belgium

Questions about the workshop? Reach out directly.

zghada90@gmail.com